Cypress Edition | August 2022

CAMPUS DATA

CYFAIR ISD A closer look at campus-level standardized test scores and other data COMPARING SCORES COMPILED BY MIKAH BOYD & DANICA LLOYD Spring 2022 results from the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness revealed Cy-Fair ISD performed at the same level or outperformed the state on average in all subjects. Local students also exceeded spring 2021 scores on average. Understanding the table The following tables reveal test results from the 2021-22 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, exam. Tables also include enrollment data, feeder school campuses and the percentage of students considered economically disadvantaged.

202122 STAAR PASSING RESULTS BY GRADE 3RD 4TH 5TH

ENROLLMENT

ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

State average District average

N/A N/A 77% 70% 77% 69% 80% 75% 66% N/A N/A N/A 80% 72% 80% 69% 84% 78% 76% N/A 809 -0.9% 77% 65% 77% 66% 89% 83% 82% 68.7% 943 +8.8% 76% 64% 69% 55% 89% 74% 81% 58.9% 964 -0.2% 91% 93% 86% 68% 91% 94% 90% 37.4% 756 -6% 62% 47% 72% 47% 64% 48% 46% 95.5% 907 +0.9% 71% 65% 73% 65% 84% 80% 72% 76.5%

N/A N/A

1 Adam 2 Andre' 3 Ault 4 Bane 5 Bang 6 Birkes 7 Black

60, 78

58, 67, 70, 82, 85

71, 77

64, 84

62, 63, 84, 87

1,061 -3.4% 83% 82% 87% 84% 85% 90% 84% 45% 59, 69, 73, 80, 83, 88

1,136 +0.7% 85% 83% 89% 76% 87% 85% 81% 43.8% 936 -0.6% 89% 81% 87% 76% 89% 83% 85% 44.6% 955 +1.3% 73% 52% 74% 64% 74% 61% 67% 81.3% 811 +3.8% 75% 65% 74% 56% 83% 80% 74% 81.4% 1,044 +6.5% 68% 61% 80% 58% 76% 61% 63% 80.8% 684 +5.4% 74% 64% 73% 59% 71% 55% 56% 83.6% 938 +2.5% 86% 83% 87% 87% 85% 85% 84% 48.1% 910 +3.5% 72% 63% 72% 54% 73% 62% 64% 67.6% 814 -3% 69% 60% 69% 63% 75% 78% 65% 88.2% 600 +5.3% 70% 48% 79% 66% 78% 71% 72% 85.2% 908 +1.9% 75% 67% 87% 79% 84% 79% 72% 62.2% 725 +2.1% 95% 89% 87% 85% 94% 91% 86% 87.6% 1,069 +9.2% 95% 91% 91% 87% 98% 96% 91% 22.3% 962 +13.4% 64% 53% 57% 43% 70% 57% 55% 77.7% 1,142 +6.7% 75% 59% 82% 73% 72% 59% 66% 78.8% 928 +10% 68% 60% 74% 53% 81% 62% 61% 90.7% 855 +8.6% 84% 74% 84% 58% 82% 82% 73% 74%

65, 66, 78, 86 59, 68, 85, 88 60, 61, 78, 79

8 Copeland 9 Danish 10 Duryea 11 Emery 12 Emmott

67, 85

STAAR RESULTS Results show the

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

70, 74, 81, 82

62, 84 65, 86 69, 80

percentage of students within the district and each campus who are approaching the grade level, which is considered passing.

These students are eligible for free or reduced-price meals or come from a family with an income below the poverty line.

13 Farney

14 Fiest

15 Francone 16 Frazier 17 Gleason 18 Hairgrove 19 Hamilton 20 Hancock

62, 79, 84

63, 87 63, 87

SOURCES: CYFAIR ISD, TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, TEXAS LEGISLATURE COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER

69, 75, 80, 84

66, 78, 79

Standardized testing scores improved across the state from 2021 to 2022, most notably in reading. Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath said the results point to a brighter future, but students are still performing below prepandemic levels in math. Cy-Fair ISD Statewide STAAR SCORE CHANGES PERCENTAGE POINT CHANGE, SPRING 2021 VS. SPRING 2022 SUBJECT GRADE

61, 79 70, 82

21 Hemmenway

22 Holbrook 23 Holmsley 24 Hoover 25 Horne

64, 84, 87 59, 68, 88

844 +8.6% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 84.2% 67, 68, 70, 82, 85, 88

906 +0.8% 75% 60% 73% 47% 82% 65% 73% 81.1%

75, 80

26 Jowell 27 Keith

620 -3.7% 74% 55% 66% 46% 74% 67% 68% 84.7% 67. 68, 70, 82, 85, 88

1,139 +4.7% 92% 90% 92% 84% 94% 94% 92% 28.5% 892 +10% 58% 49% 69% 53% 83% 73% 73% 76.5% 900 +6.6% 77% 71% 71% 67% 79% 70% 71% 67.4% 814 -3.9% 76% 64% 72% 57% 84% 85% 78% 75.8% 810 -0.6% 77% 57% 71% 54% 71% 60% 60% 85.9% 835 -1.5% 81% 72% 86% 76% 82% 75% 67% 54.5%

65, 71, 77, 86

28 Kirk

75, 84

29 Lamkin

60, 73, 78, 83

30 Lee

75, 80, 84

9% 6%

31 Lieder 32 Lowery 33 Matzke 34 McFee 35 McGown 36 Metcalf 37 Millsap 38 Moore

76, 81

3RD

59, 68, 88

1,025 -1

75% 59% 72% 53% 70% 63% 58% 71.8%

61, 79

14% 12% 8% 6% 8% 4% 10% 6% 10% 5% 9% 6% 11% 10%

4TH

1,002 -3% 74% 83% 77% 55% 74% 73% 69% 85.2% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 668 +0.9% 81% 71% 76% 74% 86% 84% 85% 83.1% 825 +3.3% 84% 69% 81% 63% 88% 79% 80% 64.2% 1,004 +11.4% 78% 76% 79% 64% 77% 71% 67% 54% 764 +3.2% 88% 86% 85% 71% 80% 80% 75% 70.8% 1,107 +6.6% 95% 96% 97% 99% 97% 98% 99% 12.5% 863 +7.2% 79% 68% 78% 56% 83% 77% 75% 67.6% 1,140 +5.6% 90% 83% 88% 81% 91% 91% 83% 44.4% 837 -2.4% 72% 69% 78% 71% 78% 75% 71% 82.8% 1,184 +8.1% 93% 88% 90% 81% 95% 92% 93% 20% 1,264 +8.1% 76% 64% 75% 65% 81% 74% 80% 80.5% 891 +2.1% 87% 88% 83% 80% 89% 89% 85% 42% 874 -1.5% 96% 91% 95% 87% 96% 97% 94% N/A 1,314 +4.5% 78% 67% 79% 66% 81% 73% 72% 79.9% 1,017 -1.6% 92% 88% 92% 91% 97% 94% 95% 10.6%

68, 74, 81, 85

72, 77 68, 88

5TH

60, 66, 78, 79

6TH

66, 79 69, 80

39 Owens 40 Pope

72, 77, 83

7TH

41 Post

62, 63, 64, 84, 87 58, 59, 83, 85, 88

42 Postma

8TH

43 Reed

64, 87 58, 83 74, 82

44 Rennell

3RD

45 M. Robinson 46 A. Robison

65, 73, 86

4TH

47 Sampson 48 Sheridan 49 Swenke 50 Tipps 51 Walker 52 Warner

73, 86

74, 76, 81

6% 4% 6% 5% 5% 9% 7%

5TH

71, 77

1,007 +4.6% 69% 65% 71% 67% 71% 60% 57% 91.5% 68, 75, 76, 80, 81, 88

977 +6% 77% 59% 77% 65% 82% 80% 72% 78.9% 1,179 +5.3% 95% 92% 91% 88% 95% 95% 92% 19.2% 1,644 +32.3% 94% 87% 95% 90% 97% 90% 94% 11.6% 880 +5.8% 76% 72% 79% 62% 86% 80% 81% 76.6% 752 +3.4% 87% 65% 78% 66% 84% 74% 71% 63.3% 1,095 +3.4% 91% 90% 86% 81% 88% 79% 76% 54.9% 847 +3.4% 68% 55% 64% 47% 80% 69% 74% 70.6%

67, 70, 82, 85

6TH

1%

72, 83 72, 77

53 Wells

7TH

54 Willbern 55 Wilson 56 Woodard

62, 63, 79, 84, 87

76, 81

8TH

59, 73, 83

57 Yeager

61, 79

0 3% 6% 9% 12% 15%

COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER • COMMUNITYIMPACT.COM

22

Powered by