Frisco | May 2025

Election

BY SAMANTHA DOUTY

City charter election results A majority of city charter amendments were approved by Frisco voters May 3. The charter amendments looked to adjust council member compensation, terms and more. Proposition K Proposition F

Shall Section 6.14 (Referendum) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to clarify the scope of the City Secretary’s review of referendum petitions?

Amended to grant authority for the City Council to hold only one regular monthly meeting in up to four months, rather than two months, out of the calendar year?

City of Frisco

69.35% For

50.5% For

30.65% Against

49.5% Against

Proposition C

Shall Section 3.02 (Limitations on Terms) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to state that no person shall serve as a Council member and Mayor (combined) for more than six consecutive elected terms rather than 18 consecutive years?

Proposition L

Proposition G

Shall Section 7.18 (Independent Audit) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to remove the requirement for publication of a summary of each independent audit in the City’s official newspaper and instead require publication of the summary on the City website, or by such other means as may be allowed by state law?

Shall Section 5.01 (City Elections) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to conform to state law the process for ordering a special election?

75.87% For

71.83% For

24.13% Against

28.17% Against

Proposition D

58.87% For

Proposition H

Shall Section 3.04 (Compensation) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to increase the amount of compensation for the Mayor and each Councilmember and to provide for annual adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)?

Amended to clarify the scope of the City Secretary’s review of petitions?

41.13% Against

Proposition M

72.65% For

Shall Section 14.08 (Conflict of Interest) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to clarify the standard for determining when a City officer or employee has a conflict of interest by referencing state law?

27.35% Against

36.13% For

Proposition I

Remove from the scope of the powers of initiative and referendum ordinances or resolutions relating to the Comprehensive Plan, amendments of the Zoning Ordinance, use of the power of eminent domain or other ordinances or resolutions not subject to initiative or referendum as provided by state law?

63.87% Against

77.84% For

22.16% Against

Proposition E

Shall Section 3.06 (Vacancies, Forfeiture and Filling of Vacancies) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to grant authority to the City Council to fill a vacated office on the City Council by appointment if the remainder of the unexpired term of the vacated office is 12 months or less?

Proposition N

Shall Section 14.09 (No Officer to Accept Gifts, Etc.) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to conform to state law the prohibitions and requirements applicable to a City official’s acceptance, agreement to accept or solicitation of gifts and other benefits and the disclosure thereof?

51.75% For

48.25% Against

53.39% For

Proposition J

Shall Section 6.13 (Initiative) of the Frisco Home Rule Charter be amended to clarify the scope of the City Secretary’s review of initiative petitions, clarify initiative petition requirements and remove the requirement for review by the City Attorney?

46.61% Against

74.32% For

25.68% Against

47.54% For

52.46% Against

SOURCE: CITY OF FRISCO/COMMUNITY IMPACT

Never settle for less than you deserve. If you’ve been INJURED let us fight for you.

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS in Settlements & Judgments

Call for a free case evaluation.

Car Accidents - Slips & Falls - Wrongful Death Dramshop Liability - Premises Liability

DAVISINJURY.COM (469) WHAM-BAM (469) 942-6226

13

FRISCO EDITION

Powered by