CAMPUS DATA
A closer look at campus-level standardized test scores and other data COMPARING CAMPUS SCORES COMPILED BY VANESSA HOLT & ANNA LOTZ
Understanding the table The following tables reveal test results from the 2021-22 State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, exam. Tables also include enrollment data, feeder school campuses and the percentage of students considered economically disadvantaged. STAAR RESULTS Results show the percentage of ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED These students are eligible for free or reduced-price meals, come from a family with an income below the poverty line, or are eligible for other speci c bene ts. SOURCES: CONROE ISD, MONTGOMERY ISD, WILLIS ISD, TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, TEXAS LEGISLATURE COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER students within the district and each campus who are approaching the grade level, which is considered passing.
CONROE ISD
A total of four Conroe ISD elementary school campuses saw lower enrollment in 2021 22 compared to 2020 21, according to the Texas Education Agency. However, none of the high schools in Conroe ISD saw a decrease in enrollment from 2020 21 to 2021 22. Fifteen of the district’s elementary schools have a higher percentage of economically disadvantaged students than the state average.
2021 22 STAAR PASSING RESULTS BY GRADE 5TH 6TH
2021 22 STAAR PASSING RESULTS BY GRADE 3RD 4TH
ENROLLMENT
ENROLLMENT
MIDDLE SCHOOLS State average District average
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
N/A N/A 80% 75% 69% 72% N/A N/A 9,009 0.71% 85% 83% 79% 85% N/A N/A 953 1.36% 70% 72% 77% 81% 60.55% 52 1,013 7.7% 90% 94% 90% 93% 18.46% 53 723 -0.83% 95% 96% 93% 96% 14.8% 48 862 -3.94% 92% 86% 84% 87% 22.04% 53 772 1.17% 82% 80% 76% 87% 55.83% 51 908 1.43% 93% 97% 98% 98% 13.88% 49 1,209 2.81% 68% 64% 57% 72% 77.01% 50 1,130 0.18% 96% 96% 92% 95% 11.95% 49 1,125 10.93% 93% 95% 89% 90% 23.38% 51 1,022 9.2% 87% 85% 85% 90% 38.36% 47 1,007 3.18% 96% 97% 91% 95% 6.75% 49 596 -3.86% 75% 68% 61% 67% 92.11% 51, 52
37 Bozman 38 Clark 39 Collins
State average District average
N/A N/A 77% 70% 77% 69% N/A 27,320 6.06% 84% 82% 86% 83% N/A
N/A N/A
1
Anderson n
703 19.91% 86% 82% 86% 81% 84.21% 37, 44 608 0.82% 64% 69% 79% 64% 94.41% 44 807 -24.04% 66% 63% 83% 79% 74.97% 42 976 2.05% 88% 90% 91% 87% 14.65% 38,40 1,019 5.59% 86% 81% 88% 82% 34.15% 38
40 Cox
2 Armstrong
41 Cryar
3 Austin
11 Deretchin* 42 Grangerland
4 Birnham Woods
5 Bradley
43 Mitchell 33 Stewart* 34 Schuma* 35 Tough*
6 Broadway 7 Buckalew
1,281
9.29% 89% 84% 90% 91% 14.36% 40
676 7.84% 97% 96% 94% 95% 10.8% 39, 43 906 12.36% 91% 85% 93% 87% 15.89% 43 839 9.54% 67% 71% 72% 58% 88.08% 42
8 Bush
9 Creighton
44 Travis 45 Vogel
10 David
621
2.9% 91% 90% 96% 97% 7.24% 45
961
-3.12% 85% 85% 77% 81% 46.2% 47
11 Deretchin*
908 1.43% 92% 91% 92% 93% 13.88% 49 922 8.24% 73% 67% 78% 58% 62.58% 40, 45
46 Wilkerson
790 2.66% 79% 75% 73% 80% 49.37% 48. 49
12 Ford
13 Galatas 14 Giesinger 15 Glen Loch
777
4.12% 94% 95% 90% 89% 6.69% 39, 43
2021 22 STAAR PASSING RESULTS BY GRADE
819 8.55% 82% 83% 82% 83% 43.59% 41
ENROLLMENT
518
0% 79% 72% 82% 78% 46.91% 46
7TH
8TH
16 Gordon-Reed**
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
51
17 Hailey 18 Hope
598 4.52% 83% 84% 77% 76% 56.02% 46
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
485
N/A 85% 82% 84% 87% 80.62% 42 0.7% 74% 65% 70% 76% 64.62% 45,46
19 Houser 20 Houston 21 Kaufman
571
613 -0.49% 68% 68% 64% 70% 94.29% 44 880 3.3% 91% 89% 87% 80% 22.95% 45 624 2.56% 80% 70% 86% 79% 46.15% 46 505 -29.9% 75% 70% 73% 79% 83.17% 42 682 12.17% 83% 84% 79% 80% 64.52% 45 898 0.11% 75% 64% 80% 80% 70.04% 37 843 7.24% 92% 94% 86% 88% 18.03% 39, 43 695 1.73% 91% 89% 89% 87% 82.01% 41 618 4.37% 70% 70% 86% 80% 63.75% 41 605 5.62% 91% 88% 92% 86% 32.56% 39 603 6.47% 70% 75% 76% 68% 81.26% 37, 44 496 -14.31% 72% 59% 76% 58% 83.06% 42 1,265 7.98% 95% 94% 95% 96% 10.2% 38, 40 1,125 10.93% 90% 92% 91% 90% 23.38% 51 1,022 9.2% 79% 81% 82% 85% 38.36% 47 1,007 3.18% 96% 95% 95% 90% 6.75% 68 805 13.91% 78% 71% 79% 81% 49.37% 41
State average District average
N/A N/A 78% 59% 82% 69% 73% 59% N/A N/A 10,735 4.01% 85% 64% 85% 85% 84% 72% N/A N/A 1,241 9.59% 82% 68% 85% 82% 83% 77% 44.88% 58 1,380 -3.19% 89% 69% 89% 92% 90% 77% 28.26% 55 2,084 0.77% 96% 79% 94% 93% 94% 91% 11.71% 60 1,299 4.46% 74% 56% 74% 72% 74% 57% 76.14% 54 1,283 0.39% 78% 57% 81% 80% 77% 59% 55.26% 56 1,416 8.47% 76% 56% 77% 74% 66% 42% 66.67% 56 2,032 7.68% 89% 68% 91% 93% 94% 88% 20.92% 57
22 Lamar 23 Milam
47 Irons 48 Knox
24 Oak Ridge 25 Patterson
49 McCullough 50 Moorhead
26 Powell 27 Reaves
51 Peet
52 Stockton
28 Rice 29 Ride
53 York
30 Runyan
2021 22 STAAR PASSING RESULTS BY GRADE
ENROLLMENT
31 San Jacinto 32 Snyder 33 Stewart* 34 Suchma* 35 Tough* 36 Wilkinson
HIGH SCHOOLS State average District average 54 Caney Creek 55 College Park
N/A N/A 74% 82% 63% 71% 89% N/A N/A 20,624 4.91% 78% 89% 72% 78% 95% 40.42% 97.3% 2,271 4.93% 58% 80% 47% 60% 88% 72.48% 95.6% 3,243 3.39% 79% 91% 79% 84% 96% 23.07% 97.2% 4,663 5.02% 59% 87% 64% 70% 92% 57.45% 97.3% 3,310 10.42% 73% 93% 83% 87% 97% 21.75% N/A 2,585 2.75% 61% 87% 67% 74% 93% 35.09% 97.7% 173 41.04% 57% 48% 20% 49% 87% 52.02% N/A 4,379 1.6% 90% 96% 91% 94% 99% 9.52% 98.9%
* K-6, ** opening 2022
56 Conroe
57 Grand Oaks 58 Oak Ridge 59 Washington
60 The Woodlands
24
COMMUNITY IMPACT NEWSPAPER • COMMUNITYIMPACT.COM
Powered by FlippingBook